Project Description

Wind Ensemble. (1991) 49′

Listen Now


Perusal Score
PDF, 91 MB
(Opens in new window)


Sheet Music
Buy Score (SheetMusicPlus)

Rent Performance Materials
(Carl Fischer)


Recordings
PermalinkGallery

Magnuson/ Gillingham/ Maslanka (2010)

Magnuson/ Gillingham/ Maslanka (2010)

Illinois State University Wind Symphony, Stephen K. Steele, cond.
PermalinkGallery

UConn Premieres (1992)

UConn Premieres (1992)

University of Connecticut Symphonic Wind Ensemble, Gary Green, cond.
PermalinkGallery

Wind Band Classics – Reflections (2007)

Wind Band Classics – Reflections (2007)

Frost Wind Ensemble at the University of Miami, Gary Green, cond., Craig Morris, trumpet


Instrumentation
Picc-2 Fl-2 Ob-2 EH EbCl BbCl-3 BCl CbCl Bsn-2 Cbsn ASx-2 TSx BSx | Hn-4 Tpt-3 Tbn-3 BTbn Euph Tuba DB | Pno Timp Perc-4


Commission
Commissioned by, and dedicated to, the University of Connecticut (Storrs) Wind Ensemble, Gary Green, conductor. The commission was funded by the Research Foundation of the University of Connecticut.


Completed
8 May 1991, Missoula, Montana


Movements

  1. Moderate ♩= 84-90
  2. ♩= ca. 72
  3. Very fast ♩= ca. 180
  4. Lament ♩= ca. 86
  5. Lament ♩= ca. 78 (“Song for a Summer Day”)

Program Notes

Symphony No. 3 was commissioned by the University of Connecticut Wind Ensemble, Gary Green, conductor. I was asked to write a “major” pice yet not necessarily one as big as this. It is hard to say why a given music emerges at a given time. In my composing life there have been “sign-post” pieces – large works that have erupted at fairly regular, though unpredictable, intervals. The impetus for this piece was in part my leaving university life a year ago and moving from New York City to the Rocky Mountains of western Montana. The mountains and the sky are a living presence. Animal and Indian spirits still echo strongly in this land, and these elements have found their way into my music.

I am very grateful to Gary Green and the University of Connecticut for sponsoring the composition of Symphony No. 3. I am especially thankful to Gary for his ardent championing of my work in recent years, and for his avid interest in the development of this new piece. His wonderful enthusiasm has sparked the creative process in a special way.

Symphony No. 3 is in five movements and runs approximately 45 minutes. The first movement is in a moderate tempo and follows one of my favorite schemes. It starts with the simplest of scale materials and evolves a steady, unbroken line from start to finish. It is in sonata form, tightly woven in character, giving it something of a Baroque feel. The movement is forceful and unrelenting for most of its duration, but ends quietly.

The second movement is a serene and beautiful “nature” music, mostly for small combinations of instruments. I am intrigued with the magical quality of sustained pure colors. Musical sound is colorful and structural at t he same time. I love a music that allows the listener to develop an intense reverie through sustained sounds, while at the same time being carried through the structure of the piece. Time and timelessness join in a powerful way, each informing and illuminating the other.

The third is a fierce and bristling fast movement that maintains its high energy from start to finish. It is also in sonata form. The development section is a fugue which rises in power to a huge climax area. The music is fixed largely in the tonality of A minor: the first and second themes are in A minor, a third theme is in D, but the exposition ends in A minor. The development begins and ends in the home key, as does the recapitulation. This unmoving tonal scheme emerged and would not be derailed, so I had to let it happen. The tonal fixation seems to underline the character of fierce power.

The fourth and fifth movements are both lamentations, though not particularly slow or “down” in spirit. It is hard to describe opposites existing in the same space and time. The music is joyous yet sorrowful, recognizing the complementary nature of life and death. These movements – indeed the entire Symphony – have grown out of my perceptions of natural forces, especially the strong currents of old life that exist here in Montana. The music is a lamentation for the loss of the old direct contact with the life of the Earth, yet a recognition that these value still exist and can be brought back into meaningful focus.

The fourth movement does not have an easily-labeled traditional form. The music moves through a series of song-like episodes, much as one might move through mountain meadows and across hills, natural vistas of great beauty appearing and dissolving as one goes. About two-thirds of the way through is the song of the “Golden Light”

The fifth movemnt might be called “Song for a Summer Day.” The character of lament is there, but the creative winds rise and bring an ecstatic vision of natural beauty and life force. The movement ends with the lament transformed into a song of quiet joy.

Program note by David Maslanka.


Further Reading

The roots and purpose of music (1992)

Remarks given at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Nov.15.1992, before a performance of Symphony No.3.

I want to give a few thoughts on the roots of […]